Upaniṣads · Mahāvākya p13
॥
Devanāgarī
ब्रह्मैक्यं तत्
Transliteración (IAST)
brahmaikyaṃ tat
Palabra por palabra
SánscritoIASTSignificado
ब्रह्म-ऐक्यं तत्brahma-aikyaṃ tatthis is union with brahman
Traducción
«This is union with brahman.»
Versión
473727c47c34 · publicado 12 ago 2026, 5:00:00 UTC
Disponible enRUENPasa de verso en verso con
It says brahma-aikyam, “union with brahman,” and this word deserves examination, for it is not the same as “identity.” Aikya is an abstract noun from eka, “one”: “oneness, unitedness.” It denotes a state of union, not the coincidence of two into one.
The difference is grammatical, but essential, and it is worth illustrating. In our own language we say “the unity of a people,” “the unity of spouses,” “unity of views.” None of these expressions means that two have become not-two; all of them mean that the two are united.
The Vaiṣṇava side builds its reading on words exactly like these, and points out that Sanskrit distinguishes them no less well: aikya (“union”), abheda (“non-difference”), tādātmya (“identity of substance”) — three different words, and the books do not use them at random. Let us add what deserves note in the construction of this line. It stands immediately after the negation of samādhi, of perfections, and of the mind's dissolution.
That is, the order is: not a state, not a capacity, not a stilling — but union. The first three are things that happen within one person; the fourth is a relation, and hence is set against them. Hence this line, brief as it is, is, to my mind, testimony in favor of relation. Had dissolution been meant, it would have been called laya, “dissolution” — the very word rejected one line above.