समाहूय महात्मानं जितवन्तो ऽक्षकोविदाः ॥
अनक्षज्ञं यथाश्रद्धं तेषु धर्मजयः कुतः ॥
यदि कुन्तीसुतं गेहे क्रीडन्तं भ्रातृभिः सह ॥
अभिगम्य जयेयुस् ते तत् तेषां धर्मतो भवेत् ॥
समाहूय तु राजानं क्षत्रधर्मरतं सदा ॥
निकृत्या जितवन्तस् ते किं नु तेषां परं शुभम् ॥
कथं प्रणिपतेच् चायम् इह कृत्वा पणं परम् ॥
वनवासाद् विमुक्तस् तु प्राप्तः पैतामहं पदम् ॥
यद्य् अयं परवित्तानि कामयेत युधिष्ठिरः ॥
एवम् अप्य् अयम् अत्यन्तं परान् नार्हति याचितुम् ॥
samāhūya mahātmānaṃ jitavanto 'kṣakovidāḥ ||
anakṣajñaṃ yathāśraddhaṃ teṣu dharmajayaḥ kutaḥ ||
yadi kuntīsutaṃ gehe krīḍantaṃ bhrātṛbhiḥ saha ||
abhigamya jayeyus te tat teṣāṃ dharmato bhavet ||
samāhūya tu rājānaṃ kṣatradharmarataṃ sadā ||
nikṛtyā jitavantas te kiṃ nu teṣāṃ paraṃ śubham ||
kathaṃ praṇipatec cāyam iha kṛtvā paṇaṃ param ||
vanavāsād vimuktas tu prāptaḥ paitāmahaṃ padam ||
yady ayaṃ paravittāni kāmayeta yudhiṣṭhiraḥ ||
evam apy ayam atyantaṃ parān nārhati yācitum ||
Men skilled in the game of dice challenged the great-souled but inexperienced Yudhishthira to play, and he trusted them and lost! Can it be said that such men won the game righteously? If they had come to Yudhishthira while he was playing at home with his brothers and had defeated him there, then what they won would have been fairly won. But they challenged Yudhishthira, who was in conscience bound to observe the rules kept by the warrior caste, and defeated him through deceit. What is righteous in their conduct? And how can this Yudhishthira -- who has fully discharged the terms set in that game, who has been released from his vow of dwelling in the forest, and who therefore has a right to his ancestor's throne -- be expected to submit?
1160aa518b2a · प्रकाशित 17 जुल॰ 2026, 3:22:50 am UTC
उपलब्ध भाषाएँRUENश्लोक बदलें इन कुंजियों से
This passage (5.3.6-10) develops the central theme of the Udyoga-parva: the effort toward peace is already underway against the backdrop of an inevitable war. Key themes: dharma. Here dharma is revealed through speech, the choice of envoys, faithfulness to promises, and the responsibility of kings for the consequences of their decisions.