उपनिषद् · Yājñavalkya 20
॥
देवनागरी
अपकारिणि कोपश्चेत्कोपे कोपः कथं न ते । धर्मार्थकाममोक्षाणां प्रसह्य परिपन्थिनि
लिप्यंतरण (IAST)
apakāriṇi kopaścetkope kopaḥ kathaṃ na te | dharmārthakāmamokṣāṇāṃ prasahya paripanthini
शब्दशः अर्थ
संस्कृतIASTअर्थ
अपकारिणि कोपः चेत्apakāriṇi kopaḥ cetif there is anger at one doing harm
कोपे कोपः कथं न तेkope kopaḥ kathaṃ na tehow then is there no anger for you at anger
धर्म-अर्थ-काम-मोक्षाणांdharma-artha-kāma-mokṣāṇāṃof law, wealth, desire, and freedom
प्रसह्य परिपन्थिनिprasahya paripanthinithe one forcibly obstructing them
अनुवाद
If there is anger at one doing harm, how then is there no anger in you at anger, which forcibly obstructs law, wealth, desire, and freedom?
संस्करण
4edc5479bdd2 · प्रकाशित 12 अग॰ 2026, 5:00:00 am UTC
उपलब्ध भाषाएँRUENश्लोक बदलें इन कुंजियों से
The second argument, and it is, to my mind, the wittiest in the whole book: kope kopaḥ kathaṃ na te, "how then is there no anger in you at anger." The construction is this: you are angry at one who harms you; but anger harms more than any enemy, for it takes away all four of a person's goals — law, wealth, desire, and freedom; why, then, are you not angry at it? This argument turns the weapon against itself and is therefore irrefutable.
It is worth noting the list too: dharma, artha, kāma, mokṣa, the four goals discussed when reading the Gaṇapati (11.2). Anger is called an obstruction to all four — that is, to both the worldly and the highest. The angry person loses both gain and pleasure, and good name, and the path.
Let us add what the Gītā says of anger, for its analysis is more detailed and worth citing. "From reflection on objects arises attachment; from attachment, desire; from desire, anger; from anger, delusion; from delusion, loss of memory; from loss of memory, the ruin of discernment; and with the ruin of discernment, he himself perishes" (2.62–63). This ladder is worth knowing by heart, for in it the whole chain is named: reflection — attachment — desire — anger — delusion — forgetting — ruin.
It is worth noting that anger stands in the middle of the chain, not at its beginning: it is a consequence of unfulfilled desire, not an independent vice. Hence treating it directly is useless; it is treated further up the chain — where attachment begins.