奥义书 · Varāha 2.68
॥
天城文
एवं स्थूलं च सूक्ष्मं च शरीरं नाभिमन्यते । प्रत्यग्ज्ञानशिखिध्वस्ते मिथ्याज्ञाने सहेतुके । नेति नेतीति रूपत्वादशरीरो भवत्ययम्
转写 (IAST)
evaṃ sthūlaṃ ca sūkṣmaṃ ca śarīraṃ nābhimanyate | pratyagjñānaśikhidhvaste mithyājñāne sahetuke | neti netīti rūpatvādaśarīro bhavatyayam
逐字释义
梵语IAST释义
एवं स्थूलं च सूक्ष्मं चevaṃ sthūlaṃ ca sūkṣmaṃ cathus, both the gross and the subtle
शरीरं न अभिमन्यतेśarīraṃ na abhimanyatebody it does not consider its own
प्रत्यक्-ज्ञान-शिखि-ध्वस्तेpratyak-jñāna-śikhi-dhvastewhen, by the fire of inner knowledge, destroyed
मिथ्या-ज्ञाने स-हेतुकेmithyā-jñāne sa-hetukeis false knowledge with its cause
अ-शरीरः भवति अयम्a-śarīraḥ bhavati ayambodiless he becomes
译文
"Thus he does not consider either the gross or the subtle body his own; when false knowledge with its cause is destroyed by the fire of inner knowledge, — by the form of 'not this, not this,' he becomes bodiless."
版本
af3d9b92e1c6 · 发布于 2026年8月12日 05:00:00 UTC
可用语言RUEN用方向键翻颂
Worth noting is the word asharira, "bodiless," for it is used here in a special sense. It is not said the body has vanished: it is said he does not consider it his own; and hence bodilessness is not the absence of the body, but the absence of appropriation. This definition is, in my view, more precise than the ordinary one, and deserves holding onto.
A person whose leg has been amputated has not become bodiless; but a person who has stopped saying "I am ill" when the body is ill has become so — though the body remains with him. Let us add what deserves saying of the phrase neti neti rupatvat, "by the form of 'not this, not this'." Of the device neti neti, discussed when reading the Mahavakya (p7), and the main point was said there: it cuts away identification, not existence.
Let us repeat the conclusion, for it is confirmed by the book itself: it is not said "there is no body," but "does not consider it his own." Let us add what the Vaishnava side supplies, which makes bodilessness acceptable. Having stopped considering the body his own, a person is not left with nothing: he gives it away. And its formula of surrender, discussed when reading the Jabala-darshana (7.11), reads: "body, home, sons, wealth — all this is Yours."
The difference between "not mine" and "Yours" is examined when reading verse forty-three; and here it fits, for the verse ends in denial, while surrender begins where denial ends.