Linux翻页
奥义书 · Muktikā 1.40
॥
天城文
एवमष्टोत्तरशतं भावनात्रयनाशनम् । ज्ञानवैराग्यदं पुंसां वासनात्रयनाशनम्
转写 (IAST)
evamaṣṭottaraśataṃ bhāvanātrayanāśanam | jñānavairāgyadaṃ puṃsāṃ vāsanātrayanāśanam
逐字释义
梵语IAST释义
एवम् अष्ट-उत्तर-शतंevam aṣṭa-uttara-śataṃthus the hundred and eight
भावना-त्रय-नाशनम्bhāvanā-traya-nāśanamdestroying the threefold imagining
ज्ञान-वैराग्य-दं पुंसांjñāna-vairāgya-daṃ puṃsāṃgiving people knowledge and dispassion
वासना-त्रय-नाशनम्vāsanā-traya-nāśanamdestroying the threefold habit
译文
«Such are the hundred and eight — destroying the threefold imagining, giving people knowledge and dispassion, destroying the threefold habit».
版本
93731adf64ad · 发布于 2026年8月12日 05:00:00 UTC
可用语言RUEN用方向键翻颂
Worth examining what is named threefold, for both are technical. Bhāvanā-traya, «threefold imagining», is interpreted as three kinds of imagination: about the body, about the world, and about scripture. Vāsanā-traya, «threefold habit», is the same thing named from the side of habit; and the second chapter of this book will devote twenty verses to it, where loka-vāsanā, śāstra-vāsanā, and deha-vāsanā will be examined — worldly, bookish, and bodily habit.
Worth noting that among the three habits is named śāstra-vāsanā, «bookish habit». That is, the list of a hundred and eight books promises to destroy, among other things, attachment to books. This construction, I think, is the best place in the whole first chapter, and it is worth stating.
The book says: read the hundred and eight — and be freed from reading too. That is, this body of writing declares its own goal to be to make itself unneeded; and this, I think, is the highest honesty writing is capable of. The Vaishnava side does not agree with this entirely, and it is worth saying in what.
It too counts śāstra-vāsanā among the hindrances, and Rūpa Gosvāmī places prajalpa, «idle talk», in the list of things that ruin devotion. But its reading does not end: hearing is the first of its nine practices and remains first to the end; and it was said at Varāha (4.31) that «a book without a teacher is interpreted however one likes». That is, for it what is destroyed is attachment to a book as one's own possession, not the hearing itself.