उपनिषद् · Rāma-tāpanī Uttara 2.18
॥
देवनागरी
सदा रामोऽहमस्मीति तत्त्वतः प्रवदन्ति ये । न ते संसारिणो नूनं राम एव न संशयः ॥ इत्युपनिषत् ॥ य एवं वेद स मुक्तो भवतीति याज्ञवल्क्यः
लिप्यंतरण (IAST)
sadā rāmo'hamasmīti tattvataḥ pravadanti ye | na te saṃsāriṇo nūnaṃ rāma eva na saṃśayaḥ || ityupaniṣat || ya evaṃ veda sa mukto bhavatīti yājñavalkyaḥ
शब्दशः अर्थ
संस्कृतIASTअर्थ
सदा रामः अहम् अस्मि इतिsadā rāmaḥ aham asmi iti“I am always Rāma”; “I am unceasingly Rāma”
तत्त्वतः प्रवदन्ति येtattvataḥ pravadanti yewho say in truth; the ones who utter it truly
न ते संसारिणः नूनम्na te saṃsāriṇaḥ nūnamthey are surely not of the round; they indeed are no captives of saṁsāra
रामः एव न संशयःrāmaḥ eva na saṃśayaḥthey are Rāma, without doubt; they are Rāma himself, beyond doubt
इति उपनिषत्iti upaniṣatsuch is the upaniṣad; this is the upaniṣad
यः एवम् वेदyaḥ evam vedawho so knows; the one who understands this
सः मुक्तः भवतिsaḥ muktaḥ bhavatihe becomes freed; is made free
इति याज्ञवल्क्यःiti yājñavalkyaḥso Yājñavalkya; so spoke Yājñavalkya
अनुवाद
“Those who say in truth: ‘I am always Rāma’ — they are surely not of the round: they are Rāma, without doubt.” Such is the upaniṣad. Who so knows becomes freed — so said Yājñavalkya.
संस्करण
386e3812c7aa · प्रकाशित 29 जुल॰ 2026, 5:15:19 am UTC
उपलब्ध भाषाएँRUENश्लोक बदलें इन कुंजियों से
The chapter ends with words stronger than which the book says nothing: “they are Rāma, without doubt”.
And right there stands the proviso without which all this would be effrontery: tattvataḥ pravadanti — “they say it in truth”.
The word tattvataḥ means “in point of fact, as it is”, and it is set deliberately. Anyone can say “I am Rāma”; to say it in truth is another matter.
What then does “in truth” mean?
The whole chapter gives the answer. Before so'ham sounded, it was said: the fourth is Rāma; the bliss of deep sleep is not the last; He who is within the sleeper is the Lord and all-knowing; and in the very line of identification stood the address “O Rāma”.
So the one who speaks in truth is he who knows whose nature he has found in himself, and does not confuse himself with Him.
The Vaiṣṇava tradition has always read this place so: it speaks of oneness of nature, not of person. We are of one essence with Him — conscious, not material; and therefore “not of the round” — no longer belonging to the wheel.
Note too the turn sadā, “always”. Not “in the hour of contemplation” but always: what you are does not depend on whether you remember it.