तौ ह द्वात्रिंशतम् वर्षाणि ब्रह्मचर्यम् ऊषतुः तौ ह प्रजापतिः उवाच किम् इच्छन्तौ अवास्तम् इति तौ ह ऊचतुः यः आत्मा अपहतपाप्मा विजरः विमृत्युः विशोकः विजिघत्सः अपिपासः सत्यकामः सत्यसंकल्पः सः अन्वेष्टव्यः सः विजिज्ञासितव्यः सः सर्वांश् च लोकान् आप्नोति सर्वांश् च कामान् यः तम् आत्मानम् अनुविद्य विजानाति इति भगवतः वचः वेदयन्ते तम् इच्छन्तौ अवास्तम् इति
tau ha dvātriṃśatam varṣāṇi brahmacaryam ūṣatuḥ tau ha prajāpatiḥ uvāca kim icchantau avāstam iti tau ha ūcatuḥ yaḥ ātmā apahatapāpmā vijaraḥ vimṛtyuḥ viśokaḥ vijighatsaḥ apipāsaḥ satyakāmaḥ satyasaṃkalpaḥ saḥ anveṣṭavyaḥ saḥ vijijñāsitavyaḥ saḥ sarvāṃś ca lokān āpnoti sarvāṃś ca kāmān yaḥ tam ātmānam anuvidya vijānāti iti bhagavataḥ vacaḥ vedayante tam icchantau avāstam iti
For thirty-two years they lived in brahmacarya. Prajāpati asked: "Desiring what have you lived here?" They answered: "'The ātman, free from evil, ageless, deathless, sorrowless, hungerless, thirstless, whose desires are true, whose resolves are true — he should be sought, he should be striven after in knowledge; he obtains all the worlds and all desires who, having found this ātman, knows him' — such is your reverence's word, as it is reported. Desiring him we have lived here."
3dab088a0dc5 · published Jul 26, 2026, 11:52:58 PM UTC
Available inRUENPage between verses with
Thirty-two years — and only then the teacher's first question! Prajāpati keeps the kings of the worlds in silent discipleship for a third of a century before asking their purpose. We have seen this pedagogy of delay in all the Chāndogya's teachers — from Satyakāma (4.10) to Pravāhaṇa (5.3.7); here it reaches its utmost scale: the truth of the ātman cannot be taught to a man in a hurry.
The pupils' answer is faultless: they repeat the manifesto they heard word for word — "such is your reverence's word, as it is reported". Thirty-two years have not blurred the formula; they hold it as one holds seed-grain until sowing. And yet note: to repeat a formula is not yet to understand it; the examination will begin with the very first lesson, and the first understanding will be false in both of them.